Kepler Robotics · China
Kepler Forerunner K2
EVIDENCE NOT READY — evidence confidence Very Low. This describes our evidence, not the machine.
These are four separate answers and are never combined. A calculated 0.0 means we scored the dimension and nothing earned credit; insufficient data means we could not calculate it at all. Neither ranks above the other. What this means →
Why these scores
Capability is 5.2 because 3 publication-eligible claim(s) fall in capability categories that carry weight for a humanoid robot. Only the strongest claim in each category counts. Commercial Reality is 5.3 based on 0 independently confirmed paying production customer(s) and 0 verified production unit(s). Evidence Confidence is 14.0 (Very Low) from 3 publishable claim(s), of which 3 are score-bearing.
Evidence at a glance
Scoring Methodology v1.2.0 (ENGINE v1)
Evidence Standard v1.1 (Durable Source Capture)
Taxonomy v1.0 (frozen)
Capability evidence
What the evidence actually establishes.
Only the strongest claim in each capability category earns credit. A claim can be publishable and still carry no score credit.
Autonomous Task Execution
No creditKepler LinkedIn states K2 'Bumblebee' performed autonomous navigation and component loading/unloading at Zhaofeng Motor. Source is Kepler's own LinkedIn (Social Media / First Party, ceiling=1). Named customer is a research lead only — NOT Independent Customer without customer-origin confirmation. T0 from this source.
Manipulation
No creditKepler official K2 page claims dual-arm collaborative handling up to 25-30 kg. CONFIGURATION SCOPE: Bipedal Development configuration. Manufacturer claim only; independent task evidence required for higher tier credit.
Mobility
No creditKepler official K2 page lists Basic, Bipedal Development (52 DoF) and Wheeled Development (30 DoF) configurations at approximately 175cm height. All claims must be configuration-scoped. 90-day delivery lead time establishes commercial availability trajectory.
Commercial reality
Who is paying, and what is actually running.
Contracted units and verified production units are different facts and are kept in different fields. Nothing here implies progression that has not happened.
| Customer | Stage | Type | Paid | Production | Months | Mode | Units | Confirmed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhaofeng Motor
Zhaofeng Motor production line |
Active | Pilot | Unknown | No | 0 | Unknown | — contracted 0 verified in production | No |
| VEICHI Electric
VEICHI Electric manufacturing facility |
Active | Pilot | Unknown | No | 0 | Unknown | — contracted 0 verified in production | No |
Specifications
Manufacturer-stated figures.
Specifications are what a manufacturer states. Verification status is shown for each.
| Field | Value | Source | Verification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compute Tops | 100 | SRC-000038 | Verified |
| Delivery Lead Days | 90 | SRC-000038 | Verified |
| Dof Bipedal | 52 [Bipedal Development config] | SRC-000038 | Verified |
| Dof Wheeled | 30 [Wheeled Development config] | SRC-000038 | Verified |
| Height Cm | ~175 | SRC-000038 | Verified |
Evidence ledger
Every source behind these numbers.
Showing 3 of 3 sources. Sources that earned no credit are listed too, marked as context only.
Kepler Forerunner K2 — Official Product Page
Kepler Robotics
Kepler LinkedIn — K2 Bumblebee at Zhaofeng Motor Production Line
Kepler Robotics
Kepler LinkedIn — K2 Trial at VEICHI Electric Manufacturing
Kepler Robotics
Compare Kepler Forerunner K2
Put this profile side by side with up to three other robots. No composite winner is ever produced.
Open compareSomething wrong here?
Anyone may submit a correction or new evidence, Kepler Robotics included. Submissions never change a score directly.
Submit a correction